THE DUTY OF THE SUCCUMBING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY THE PARTY HARMED BY THE LOSSES WITH THE LAWSUIT. ALTERNATIVELY, IS IT POSSIBLE TO WIN WITHOUT LOSING?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i30.p63-90.2021

Keywords:

ontractual fees, Succumbence, Abuse of right of action, Losses and damages

Abstract

Objective: This is a research aimed at analyzing the controversy existing in the Brazilian judicial system regarding the reparation of losses and damages suffered by the party that wins a lawsuit, due to the hiring of a legal professional to act in court in its favor. The research outlined as a problem to be answered whether it is possible to conceive, of lege lata, a civil liability system so that the party succumbing to a lawsuit indemnifies the winning party for the losses resulting from that action.

Methodology: Adopting a qualitative and quantitative method, the research verified the judgments of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the possibility of restoring contractual fees to the winner of the claim, as well as the grounds used for such decisions.

Results: It found that the majority understanding in the Superior Court of Justice’s Sections on the issue does not align with the interpretations given to articles 389, 395 and 404 of the Civil Code, which include contractual fees as part of the losses and damages subject to reimbursement in favor the victim of the offense.

Contributions: The literature review methodology revealed that although there is sufficient normative and theoretical substrate recognizing the possibility, the courts do not apply it in a peaceful manner. The research, then, elaborates a propositional and inspiring thesis that justifies the duty of the succumbing party to indemnify the winning party for the losses that it had with the hiring of a lawyer to be in court.

Author Biographies

Gilberto Fachetti Silvestre, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

Professor do Departamento de Direito e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito (Mestrado em Direito Processual) da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Doutor em Direito Civil pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP); Mestre em Direito Processual Civil pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Coordenador dos Grupos de Pesquisa “Desafios do Processo” e “Medicina Defensiva” (PPGDIR/UFES); Advogado. E-mail: gilberto.silvestre@ufes.br. Orcid iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-7348. Lattes iD: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7148335865348409

Felipe Sardenberg Guimarães Trés Henriques, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

Acadêmico de Direito da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Pesquisador da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES) no Programa Institucional de Iniciação Científica (UFES/PIIC/FAPES) e dos Grupos de Pesquisa “Desafios do Processo” e “Medicina Defensiva”. E-mail: felipe.tres@hotmail.com. Lattes iD: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7550900774360494. Orcid iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-7284.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-20

How to Cite

SILVESTRE, Gilberto Fachetti; HENRIQUES, Felipe Sardenberg Guimarães Trés. THE DUTY OF THE SUCCUMBING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY THE PARTY HARMED BY THE LOSSES WITH THE LAWSUIT. ALTERNATIVELY, IS IT POSSIBLE TO WIN WITHOUT LOSING?. Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza), Fortaleza, v. 19, n. 30, p. 63–90, 2021. DOI: 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i30.p63-90.2021. Disponível em: https://unichristus.emnuvens.com.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3499. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 30 (2021)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS

The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.

1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.

2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.

3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT

By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.

1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.