THE REGULATION OF DISRUPTIVE DECISIONS IN BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL POWER AND THE APPLICATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: NATURAL JUDGE OR "ARTIFICIAL JUDGE"?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i30.p91-117.2021Keywords:
General Data Protection Law (LGPD), Judiciary Branch, Automated decisions, Risk Society, Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary, Brazilian Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
Objective: The objective of this scientific article is to address artificial intelligence (AI) in the multifaceted regulatory aspect. The central hypothesis is that the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD) seems to have regulated some aspects of this new technology, even though there is no specific legislation in Brazil. This view makes it possible to use that Law as a normative guideline, combined with the precautionary principle, in promoting the safe use of AI in the Brazilian judiciary.
Methodology: The methodological option adopted is located within the limits of the legal-dogmatic line and uses deductive reasoning. Due to the low production of scientific research in the national scenario, the authors used the exploratory methodology to expand the search for materials in the international specialized literature. It is research and documentary survey.
Results: The importance of LGPD is to use it as an initial regulatory framework for AI in Brazilian Courts since this Law can act as a strategy to implement a new vision based on secure technological development. There is no definitive conclusion to the topic. However, it was also possible to prove the importance of the theoretical and historical burden of the precautionary principle as a legal instrument capable of minimizing and/or circumventing the possible negative effects in the application of this new technology.
Contributions: The central contribution of this research is to identify the potential risks of the use of AI in the Judiciary and to indicate alternative readings that can help in the solution of these undesirable effects to the jurisdictions. The basis of this vision is in the theoretical constructions that can illuminate the paths of security and prudent technological development.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS
The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.
1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.
2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.
3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.
1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.