Restorative justice as an alternative approach in the smuggling case in Aceh

Résumé

Objectives: This article aims to explore the feasibility and applicability of restorative justice as a solution for resolving disputes and crimes related to Rohingya smuggling in Aceh. The study investigates the fundamental features of restorative justice, emphasizing its guiding concepts.

Methodology: Utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, the research incorporates literature studies, case studies, comparative studies, and qualitative analysis to comprehensively analyze the potential of restorative justice in addressing Rohingya smuggling cases.

Findings: The study reveals that applying restorative justice to instances of refugee smuggling can yield significant benefits. Key findings include the active engagement of all parties, the fulfillment of victims' rights, rehabilitation of perpetrators, and sustained reconciliation.

Conclusion: The application of restorative justice increases the likelihood of recovery and justice in Rohingya smuggling cases. By ensuring the active involvement of all stakeholders, respecting victims' rights, rehabilitating perpetrators, and fostering ongoing reconciliation, restorative justice proves to be a promising avenue.

Recommendations: The article concludes with several proposals to address obstacles and enhance the possibilities of implementing restorative justice in resolving incidents of Rohingya smuggling in Aceh. These recommendations aim to strengthen the effectiveness of restorative justice practices and facilitate positive outcomes.